AMD EPYC Genoa with 96 Zen 4 cores is an insanely quick chip, crushes all different x86 processors in leaky benchmarks

The most recent benchmarks of the following AMD EPYC Genoa 96-core processor primarily based on the Zen 4 core structure have been leaked by Yuuki_AnS. Leaked benchmarks present document x86 efficiency and that is from an engineering pattern.

AMD’s EPYC Genoa 96 Core “Zen 4” processor crushes all x86 processors available on the market

The leaked AMD EPYC Genoa 9000 chip is one among a number of Zen 4 server processors that the pink crew will launch later this 12 months for the server market. We recently covered the specifications of the entire range from the identical supply and now Yuuki_AnS has launched the very first benchmarks which present monstrous efficiency for the engineering pattern.

AMD EPYC Genoa processors will characteristic as much as a gargantuan 96 cores and 192 threads packed right into a single chip. Right here you possibly can see two of those chips operating on the identical platform for a complete of 192 cores and 384 threads. (Picture credit: Yuuki_AnS)

The particular AMD EPYC Genoa processor OPN and SKU title was not talked about, however we imagine it may be the EPYC 9654P, which is without doubt one of the SKUs that characteristic the identical specs, which options 96 cores and 192 threads primarily based on Zen 4 core structure. The chip makes use of 384 MB of L3 cache and has a base frequency of two.15 GHz. Increase frequencies are rated at 3.05 GHz for all cores, single-core frequencies of three.5-3.7 GHz, and a low-use working frequency of three.5 GHz. At full load, the chip attracts 360W of energy, which is a really affordable quantity contemplating Intel’s chips have a most energy restrict of over 700W.

AMD EPYC 9000 Genoa Processor SKU “Preliminary” Specs:

Processor title Cores / Threads Hidden Clock speeds PDT State
EPYC-9654P 96/192 384 MB 2.0-2.15GHz 360W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9534 64/128 256 MB 2.3-2.4GHz 280W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9454P 48/96 256 MB 2.25-2.35GHz 290W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9454 48/96 256 MB 2.25-2.35GHz 290W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9354P 32/64 256 MB 2.75-2.85GHz 280W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9354 32/64 256 MB 2.75-2.85GHz 280W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9334 32/64 128 MB 2.3-2.5GHz 210W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9274F 24/48 256 MB 3.4-3.6GHz 320W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9254 24/48 128 MB 2.4-2.5GHz 200W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9224 24/48 64 MB 2.15-2.25GHz 200W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9174E 16/32 256 MB 3.6-3.8GHz 320W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9124 16/32 64 MB 2.6-2.7GHz 200W Prepared for manufacturing
EPYC 9000 (ES) 96/192 384 MB 2.0-2.15GHz 320-400W ES
EPYC 9000 (ES) 84/168 384 MB 2.0GHz 290W ES
EPYC 9000 (ES) 64/128 256 MB 2.5-2.65GHz 320-400W ES
EPYC 9000 (ES) 48/96 256 MB 3.2-3.4GHz 360W ES
EPYC 9000 (ES) 32/64 256 MB 3.2-3.4GHz 320W ES
EPYC 9000 (ES) 32/64 256 MB 2.7-2.85GHz 260W ES

AMD’s EPYC Genoa 96 Core ES processor was examined in a dual-socket configuration, 192 cores and 384 threads in whole. Nevertheless, the present benchmarks do not assist greater than 128 cores as talked about by the leaker and the efficiency was measured within the Home windows Server 2025 preview, so we’re taking a look at a really unoptimized take a look at ecosystem. It’s said that the efficiency hole between the ES half examined right here and the ultimate model can be large, so we are able to count on even increased efficiency on retail chips.

Benchmarks of AMD EPYC Genoa 96 Core and Intel Sapphire Rapids-SP processors (Picture credit: Yuuki_AnS):

Xeon Platinum 8480+ (56×2 SPR-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8480 (56×2 SPR-SP)

EPYC 7773X (64×2 Milan-X)

Xeon Platinum 8280L (28×8 CSL-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8380 (40×2 ICL-SP)

0

15000

30000

45000

60000

75000

90000

Xeon Platinum 8280L (28×8 CSL-SP)

EPYC 7773X (2×64 Milan-X)

Xeon Platinum 8380 (40×2 ICL-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8480+ (56×2 SPR-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8480 (56×2 SPR-SP)

Shared efficiency metrics could be discovered in several variations of CPU-z, V-Ray, and the extremely popular Cinebench benchmarks. In CPU-z v17, the AMD EPYC Genoa 96 Core processor scored 740.2 factors within the single-threaded and 73057.5 factors within the multi-threaded benchmark. In CPU-z AVX-512, the chip scored 627.2 factors in single-core assessments and 15625.1 factors in multi-core assessments. For comparability, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper Professional 3995WX with 64 Zen 2 cores has a multithreaded efficiency of 30,917 factors, which is a 2.36x enchancment in multithreaded efficiency. Within the leaked benchmark outcomes that evaluate the chip with never-before-seen offers from Sapphire Rapids-SPthe processor lacks behind in single-threaded benchmarks, however outperforms its rival in multi-threaded workloads.

0

15000

30000

45000

60000

75000

90000

EPYC 7773X (64×2 Milan-X)

Xeon Platinum 8480+ (2×56 SPR-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8380 (2×40 ICL-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8480 (2×56 SPR-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8280L (28×8 CSL-SP)

In V-Ray, the chip scored 88,300 factors within the multi-core benchmark take a look at. For comparability, AMD’s personal Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX benchmarks present a efficiency rating of 60,111 factors for the 64 Core Zen 3 chip. That is an enormous 47% enchancment, however be aware that this is not even the ultimate type of the 96-core Genoa flagship. Within the leaked benchmarks, the chip presents a 4.5% CPU efficiency enchancment over its predecessor, the EPYC 7773X, which is predicted as a result of low clock speeds the ES chip was operating at.

0

16796

33592

50388

67184

83980

100776

EPYC 7773X (64×2 Milan-X)

Xeon Platinum 8280L (28×8 CSL-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8480+ (56×2 SPR-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8480 (56×2 SPR-SP)

Xeon Platinum 8380 (40×2 ICL-SP)

Lastly, now we have the Cinebench efficiency benchmarks which had been examined on all three variations (R15, R20, R23). In Cinebench R15, the chip scored 188 factors in single-core and 11,577 factors in multi-core. In Cinebench R20 the chip scored 416 factors in single-core and 26,285 factors in multi-core whereas in Cinebench R23 the chip scored 1227 factors. factors in single-core assessments and 100,776 factors in multi-core assessments. Right here the processor destroys Intel choices, however be aware that solely 128 cores are utilized in all three variations and at a decrease clock charge as properly, which is a far cry from its last increase of three.05GHz.

AMD’s EPYC Genoa processors will characteristic 128 PCIe Gen 5.0 lanes, 160 for a 2P (dual-socket) configuration. The SP5 platform can even characteristic assist for DDR5-5200 reminiscence, which is an insane enchancment over current DDR4-3200 MHz DIMMs. However that is not all, it should additionally assist as much as 12 channels of DDR5 reminiscence and a pair of DIMMs per channel, which can enable as much as 3TB of system reminiscence utilizing 128GB modules. AMD EPYC 9000 Genoa is predicted to launch within the second half of this 12 months.

AMD EPYC Milan Zen 3 vs EPYC Genoa Zen 4 Dimension Comparisons:

Processor title AMD EPYC Milano AMD EPYC Genoa
Course of node TSMC 7nm TSMC 5nm
Primary Structure Zen 3 Zen 4
Zen CCD array dimension 80mm2 72mm2
Zen IOD Matrix Dimension 416mm2 397mm2
Substrate space (bundle) To be decided 5428mm2
grip space 4410mm2 6080mm2
Socket title LGA 4094 LGA 6096
TDP of max. 450W 700W

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.